Although much of the buzz this year has been about small, mirrorless cameras, the big-boy DSLR makers (Nikon and Canon) haven’t been entirely asleep at the switch. The new Canon 70D is most notable for it’s groundbreaking Dual Pixel CMOS autofocus sensor, which is used in video and Live View modes. The Canon 70D and an explanation of autofocus technologies are the topics of this episode of All About the Gear.
Thanks to our friends at BorrowLenses.com, I had a 70D and an assortment of Canon lenses to test for two weeks. For me, what’s been most interesting has been to learn what it’s like to shoot with a Canon DSLR. That’s because I’ve been a Nikon guy since 1971. Yup, this was the first time I’ve ever used one of those “other” cameras, so I thought that would be an interesting perspective for this review. I’ll get to that after we go through the usual stuff.
Handheld Macro: EF-S 18-135mm STM, 1/200 second, f/16, 107mm, ISO 640
I should state at the start that I’m an outlier when it comes to my assessment of the Canon 70D. Most reviewers think it’s a great still-image camera including my friend and fellow TWiP co-host, Derrick Story (Canon 70D Lives Up to the Hype). I’m not similarly impressed. I think the Dual-Pixel autofocus technology is exciting and this is a good DSLR for video (if you want to use a DSLR for video), but maybe it’s because I’ve recently tested such great cameras as the Fuji X-E1/E2 that I found the 70D rather unimpressive in still-image quality given its price.
Here are the highlights:
- An update of the popular 60D
- 20.2MP sensor, 1.6x crop (Canon calls this APS-C.)
- 7fps still frame rate
- US$1,199 for the body only, or $1,549 with the 18-135mm macro kit lens (good lens value)
- WiFi similar to the 6D, although I didn’t have an opportunity to test it
- 30% faster (than the 60D) phase-detection autofocus on the image sensor!
The 70D’s sensor is about average for a recent APS-C DSLR. I found the color and dynamic range to be weak for a US$1,200 camera. The high-ISO (low light) performance was a bit weak for a camera in this class. In short, there are many other cameras with more impressive sensors at this price, although you may have to get away from DSLRs and go to mirrorless bodies to find one.
Again, consider that other reviewers disagree with me. Derrick Story wrote, “Terrific low light/high ISO performance”. For me, the camera topped out around ISO 800, which I don’t consider at all “high” by today’s standards. Gordon Laing over at CameraLabs.com wrote, “The Canon EOS 70D is one of the most capable all-round cameras I’ve tested, DSLR or otherwise.” This is one of the few times I’ve arrived at a different conclusion than either Derrick or Gordon. I hope it’s not just due to my greater exposure to Nikon gear than to Canon.
For detailed explanations of the various autofocus technologies, you might want to start by reading a separate blog post I’ve written on the topic and/or watching the above video of All About the Gear episode #9. I’ll assume you’ve got an understanding of these technologies as background.
When shooting sill images not in Live View mode, the 70D’s autofocus uses a 19-point cross-type phase-detection sensor borrowed from the 7D. It’s the autofocus in Live View and video modes that has generated all the buzz about this camera.
The 70D is Canon’s technology showcase for their new Dual Pixel sensor, which adds phase-detection (PD) directly to the camera’s image sensor. Normally, PD elements are found only on the separate autofocus sensor that works when a DSLR’s mirror is down and blocking the image sensor. But because Canon has figured out how to add phase detection to virtually every pixel on the image sensor, these autofocus points can be used in Live View and video modes (ie, when the mirror is up). In fact, the autofocus of the Canon 70D in both Live View and video modes is better than any other DSLR I’ve used. Unlike other hybrid (PD on the image sensor) technologies from Sony, Fujifilm and Olympus, the 70D allows the autofocus area to be anywhere except the 20% outermost edges of the image.
Video is the big winner here. There’s almost none of the annoying hunting that we’re so used to with most DSLRs and mirrorless cameras in video mode. That hunting gives our videos a very amateurish look, which is one reason pros never use autofocus during a shot, but instead adjust focus manually. Tracking in video mode seemed to be particularly good when face tracking was used to follow faces. That it does quite well. Non-face object tracking was not as good (depending on the object) and easily fooled.
Because it uses phase detection and the LCD is a touch screen, the 70D does a great job simulating a focus pull in video mode. You can’t control the rate of the focus change, but all you need to do is touch the foreground or background object to which you want to shift the focus, and the camera does it smoothly and (if you’re using one of the new STM lenses) quietly.
Canon’s Dual Pixel autofocus isn’t perfect, but it’s a substantial improvement and raises the bar for all manufacturers of cameras that shoot both stills and video.
The 60D was (I think) the first Canon DSLR to have a fully articulating LCD. The 70D’s LCD works in the same way: you can swing it out, tilt it up or down or flip it around to face the front, which is great for shooting stills and particularly stills and videos of yourself alone or in a group. What’s new in the 70D is that the LCD has become an excellent touch screen as well.
The Menu button has been moved to the upper-left rear corner and replaced with a (Q)uick button, which has become so common on smaller mirrorless cameras. The 70D’s Quick menu is one of the best I’ve used because the icons and controls are large and clear. Some other camera manufacturers have squeezed so much into their touch menus that it’s hard to use them precisely. Think of the accuracy of typing on a mobile-phone keyboard as compared to the one on your computer.
I had a chance to use five Canon lenses for these tests. Two were EF-S image-stabilized (IS) zooms designed for cameras like the 70D with smaller cropped sensors, the other three were EF primes that can also be used on cameras with larger full-frame sensors. Three of the lenses had Canon’s Ultrasonic (USM) autofocus motors, which are considered too noisy for use with the internal microphone and probably with a mic mounted on the hot shoe as well. The other two lenses use Canon’s quieter STM stepper motors for autofocus. And yes, they’re much quieter.
- EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Macro (US$549). This is the kit lens I described above. I liked it.
- EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS (US$879). Optically better than the 17-135mm, and with a constant f/2.8 aperture. A good upgrade to the kit lens if you don’t need the longer focal length, macro capability or near-silent autofocus.
- EF 85mm f/1.8 (US$419). This is a great lens for the price. We Nikon shooters have to pay nearly US$100 more for a lens that I think isn’t quite as sharp. On the 70D it has the same field of view as a 135mm lens has on a full-frame body.
- EF 50mm f/1.4 (US$399). With a field of view that’s the equivalent of 80mm on a full-frame camera, this makes for a slightly long general-purpose lens. Because it still has the distortion characteristics of its 50mm optics, it’s a bit short for flattering portrait work. The 85mm would be a better choice. Again, the equivalent Nikon is about US$85 more expensive.
- EF 40mm f/2.8 STM (US$199). Full-frame Canon shooters love this pancake lens, and now I understand why. It’s tiny, sharp and inexpensive. Unfortunately, on the 70D it has the equivalent field of view of a 62mm lens on a full-frame camera. In other words, it’s a slightly long lens instead of being a wide-angle.
The Nikon-to-Canon Learning Curve
It’s clear that Nikon and Canon DSLRs are more alike than they are different. That’s probably because of the decades these two vendors have played leapfrog with one another. Every time one of them has added some new feature, the other has done the same and more. At this point, the differences between their product lines are probably more style than substance. To be honest, if I hadn’t started with Nikon more than 40 years ago because I got one as a wedding gift, I could be just as happy with Canon gear. Sorry if you thought I might settle the Nikon vs. Canon debate. The differences just aren’t enough to declare a winner. Having said that, however, it did take a while to get used to the 70D. The biggest problem was the difference in the philosophy and implementation of the controls.
What’s with all those buttons? I’m told they’re pretty standard for Canon DSLRs. There are so many buttons on the top, they had to add a dimple to one of them (the ISO button in the image above) so you can find your way around the 70D. It’s a damn keyboard up there! There are six buttons plus a control wheel and the shutter release on the top of the camera, plus four more along the top-right rear.
But overall, once I adjusted, I found the controls to be as good as Nikon’s although still not as nice as those on the smaller cameras by Olympus, Panasonic, Fuji and Sony Alphas.
For a still camera that shoots video, where video is very important, the 70D is hard to beat. But if your needs are more towards still images than those that move, even after two weeks I’m just not all that impressed with the 70D for still photography. For the still-photography mission, I think you should at least consider these other cameras:
- At US$1,150, the Nikon D7100 is US$50 cheaper, and I think it’s a better camera for still photography (not video). It has a great 24MP sensor (good in low light, high ISO), shoots 6fps, but it doesn’t have an articulating LCD.
- Even the Nikon D5300 (only US$800) probably beats the 70D at still photography. Plus the D5300 does have an articulating LCD so it may be a competitor for video. (I have not personally tested a D5300 yet.)
- With roughly the same size sensor as the 70D, the Fujifilm X-E2 (US$1,000) is an awesome camera. I reviewed the previous version X-E1 in All About the Gear #7.
- The US$950 Sony NEX-7 and even the US$650 NEX-6 are better still cameras, although the Sonys don’t come close to having the selection of lenses available for Canon cameras. And those NEX LCD menus are just awful.
- Finally are the better micro four-thirds cameras, which may be the closest to the 70D in terms of still-photo performance. The Panasonic Lumix GX7 (US$1,100) reviewed in All About the Gear #8 is great for stills but again weaker than the 70D for video. The Olympus OM-D E-M5 (US$950) sensor isn’t quite up to the performance of the 70D’s, but the sensor in the new (untested by me) E-M1 (US$1,400) is apparently superior.
[Note: The above comparisons are partially based on quantitative testing by sites such as DxOMark, which while helpful don’t always tell the whole story.]
I’m not saying that Nikon is better than Canon, but I don’t believe this Canon camera beats the equivalent cameras from Nikon, Sony, Fuji, Panasonic/Lumix or Olympus except maybe for shooting video.
So who should consider the 70D?
If you already have an investment in Canon lenses and want to use them for video, this could be a good camera for you. With a great articulating LCD, touch focusing and the new Dual Pixel autofocus technology, the 70D is probably one of the best DSLRs for video, even if it’s a so-so performer as a still camera.
Likewise, if you’re just getting started and for some reason want to go with Canon products — maybe your father is going to give you his old lenses — the 70D is a reasonable stepping stone, particularly if you want to shoot video.
As far as lenses, I’ve already recommended the EF-S 18-155mm macro kit lens. Other STM (quiet focusing) lenses are also good for video. The two EF primes I tested (50mm f/1.4, and 85mm f/1.8) are USM (not STM) lenses and therefore a bit noisier while autofocusing, but they’re compatible with full-frame Canon bodies (should you upgrade later) and well worth their costs.
Finally, if you want an even more detailed review of the Canon 70D, check out the one by my friend Gordon Laing on Camera Labs. Also check out the soon-to-be-published book all about the 70D from Nicole S. Young.
7 thoughts on “Canon 70D”
Nice review. One nit: you didn’t mention the obvious Canon competition for the 70D, namely the T5i. Its cheaper and smaller, so it is attractive to folks just starting into DSLR.
I own a 70D and also the 60D. I tested it against the D7100, and I liked the results of my camera. I have a 24-105mm, f/4, IS, ‘L’ mounted for walk around and I also have the Sigma 10-20 for Wide-Angle. I find this to be a big improvement over my 60D. I am a advanced amateur, and this is just my opinion.
I recently had to upgrade from my 7yrs old Canon 350D Rebel and after much thought I finalized on 70D with th 18-135 lens kit. The most important reason for choosing for me was that Canon 70D is the latest edition to the canon (released mid 2013) while most other cameras were atleast a year older. Also one more plus was the WiFi which allows remote shooting from my smartphone or tablet. I still have not explored much about the still photograph and to compare whether it is better than my 350D or not.
Nice review, very good camera.
Will 3rd party lenses like the Tamron 15-70 II VC autofocus while shooting video? Thanks so much!
Can’t say for sure, Kgnikon, as I didn’t test any.
I thought this was a very good review and all points where spot on. Compared to other manufacturers, this is a middling stills camera for what it costs.
Even though this is an older review, I would like to add something here though, and that is who this camera is really aimed at. I realize that this comment is a bit long, but stay with me here.
I’m a Canon camera owner. I shoot both stills and video. My stills camera is not a 7D or a 60D, or a 5D mark anything, it’s a much older (but for Canon still pretty nice camera) Digital Rebel XTi DSLR. It shoots 10 megapixel 12 bit raw stills.
Compared to even todays top end point and shoot class cameras (and camera phones), it blows the doors off of them in terms of stills image quality and dynamic range, (the secret is in the glass, not the camera, even at a lowly 10Mp, you can tell the resolving power difference between crappy glass, OK glass, and good glass in your image quality, which should say a lot for how much sensor resolution you really actually need to have for stills).
For a tech geek and a busy dad, the Digital Rebel XTi is an awesome stills camera and I would never trade it in for a point and shoot, even if it was a high end point and shoot. I’ve also acquired a fair amount of Canon glass over the years, so save for shooting some super telephoto stuff, I’ve got a collection of decent glass to cover just about anything I’d be shooting with any regularity.
I also own a slightly older (though not as old as my XTi), “prosumer” Canon camcorder that has a 1/3″ native 1080p sensor, and for full HD video, it shoots video as good as its going to get without spending a LOT more money for a pro level broadcast video camera.
I believe that the future is going to be what I call “motion imagery”, meaning, your camera can (and should) competently capture both stills and video and have features and functionality that are right at home on both a stills camera and on a decent camcorder. I would love to have such a camera, and the 70D is one of the first in this category that is actually pretty good, which is why I went and bought one.
As a stills camera, it is a DRAMATIC upgrade over my XTi. Nearly two stops more dynamic range, and DOUBLE the raw image resolution, this is a no-brainer upgrade for guys like me that have older Canon DSLR stills cameras like the XT, XTi, T2i, T3i, etc.
As a video camera, it has a lot of the same features and functionality that my camcorder has. Articulating LCD? Check. Face detection? Check. Good autofocus? Check. Touch to focus? Check. Full HD? Check. High bit-rate codec? Check. In the video department, it easily matches or bests most consumer/prosumer HD camcorders (and is better in so many other ways), and if you’re looking for a good combo stills/camcorder camera, and have older Canon gear, this is a no-brainer, no deliberation, purchase. It is only going to get better from there.
Now, when I’m at the park with my family or at a family event taking pictures, and I hear what used to be the dreaded words “Quick, take a video!”, it’s no longer a mad scramble to put the DSLR down and pull out the camcorder or iPhone, and try to get it set right so the video is usable before the moment passes, and instead, a simple flick of a switch on the back of my 70D, frame, focus, and record, just like I would with my camcorder. That’s the real power of this camera. Primarily be a pretty competent stills camera (again, for a Canon at this price, pretty good), and very quickly turn into a pretty awesome camcorder when you need it to. For the non-professional (and possibly the professional), it is the future, and the 70D is a solid early entry into that future.
The 70D is not primarily meant for professionals, it’s meant for guys who want good stills and good video in one camera. Guys like me.